Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente | Prochaine révision Les deux révisions suivantes | ||
|
faq:peer-to-peer-est-ce-legal [le 28/10/2017 à 13h41] 111110101011 [Usage de réseaux ouverts] |
faq:peer-to-peer-est-ce-legal [le 28/10/2017 à 14h04] 111110101011 [Usage de réseaux ouverts] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 37: | Ligne 37: | ||
| - | ===== Usage de réseaux ouverts ===== | + | ===== Usage de réseaux |
| Une piste : https:// | Une piste : https:// | ||
| Ligne 43: | Ligne 43: | ||
| “Someone who has an open network cannot be held responsible for copyright violations – such as downloading movies – if they provide others with access to their internet connection. This has been decided in a European Court ruling last year,” she states. | “Someone who has an open network cannot be held responsible for copyright violations – such as downloading movies – if they provide others with access to their internet connection. This has been decided in a European Court ruling last year,” she states. | ||
| - | Retrouver l' | + | The Copyright Professor refers to the McFadden vs Sony Music ruling where the EU Court of Justice found that the operator of an open WiFi network can’t be held liable for infringements carried out by his users. |
| + | |||
| + | National courts have some leeway and could order someone to protect his or her WiFi connection, but this doesn’t mean that they are liable for past infringements. | ||
| Il y a bien sûr une contradiction entre " | Il y a bien sûr une contradiction entre " | ||
| + | |||
| + | L' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||